Pyrrhus
of Epirus

See also
www.richardevers.nl
for information about the novel I wrote about the life of Pyrrhus:

Plutarch:
"One is the best of all omens, to fight for the sake of King
Pyrrhus" |
Pyrrhus (318/9-272 BC)
King
of Hellenistic Epirus whose costly military successes against Macedonia and Rome
gave rise to the phrase “Pyrrhic victory.” His Memoirs and books on the art of
war were quoted and praised by many ancient authors, including Cicero. He was
the nephew and successor of Alexander 'the Molossian' and had also married a
daughter of Agathocles of Syracuse, and seems to have regarded himself as a
predestined successor to both.
Upon becoming ruler at the age of 12, Pyrrhus allied
himself with Demetrius, son of Antigonus I Monophthalmus of Macedonia. Dethroned
by an uprising in 302, Pyrrhus fought beside Demetrius in Asia and was sent to
Alexandria as a hostage under the treaty between Ptolemy I Soter and Demetrius.
Ptolemy befriended Pyrrhus and in 297 restored him to his kingdom.
Plutarch on Pyrrhus:
"It is said that when Antigonus was asked who was the best
general, he replied, 'Pyrrhus, if he lives to be old enough'. " |
At first Pyrrhus reigned with a kinsman, Neoptolemus,
but soon he had his colleague assassinated. In 294 he exploited a dynastic
quarrel in Macedonia to obtain the frontier areas of Parauaea and Tymphaea,
along with Acarnania, Ampholochia, and Ambracia. Corcyra and Leucas were given
to him in a marriage dowry. Next, he went to war against his former ally, now
Demetrius I Poliorcetes of Macedonia. Pyrrhus took Thessaly and the western half
of Macedonia and relieved Athens from Demetrius' siege, but was driven back into
Epirus by Lysimachus (who had supplanted Demetrius) in 284.
Polybius on the Phalanx (book XVIII):
"In the case of the Romans also each soldier with his arms occupies
a space of three feet in breadth (...) The consequence will be that
one Roman must stand opposite two men in the first rank of the
phalanx, so that he has to face and encounter ten pikes, and it is
both impossible for a single man to cut through them all in time
once they are at close quarters (...) So it is easy to see that, as
I said at the beginning, nothing can withstand the charge of the
phalanx as long as it preserves its characteristic formation and
force.
What then is the reason of the Roman success, and was is it that
defeats the purpose of those who use the phalanx? (...) It is
acknowledged that the phalanx requires level and clear ground with
no obstacles (...)
The Romans do not make their line equal in
force to the enemy and expose all the legions to a frontal attack by
the phalanx, but part of their forces remain in reserve and the rest
engaged the enemy. Afterwards (the phalanx) leave behind the other
parts of their own army, upon which the enemy's reserve have room
enough in the space formerly held by the phalanx to attack no longer
in front but appearing by a lateral movement on the flank and rear
of the phalanx. (...)
The phalanx soldier can be of service neither
in detachments nor singly, while the Roman formation is efficient.
For every Roman soldier, once he is armed and sets about his
business, can adapt himself equally well to every place and time and
can meet attack from every quarter. He is likewise equally prepared
and equally in condition whether he has to fight together with the
whole army or with a part of it or in maniples or singly. " |
In 281 Tarentum (in southern Italy) asked for
Pyrrhus' assistance against Rome. He crossed to Italy with about 25,000 men, and
in 280 won a complete, if costly, victory over a Roman army at Heraclea. In 279
Pyrrhus, again suffering heavy casualties, defeated the Romans at Ausculum (Ascoli
Satriano) in Apulia.
He
then crossed to Sicily (278) and, as “king of Sicily,” conquered most of the
Punic province except Lilybaeum (Marsala). However, his despotic methods
provoked a revolt of the Greek Sicilians, and in 276 (or early 275) he returned
to Italy. In 275 he suffered heavy losses in a battle against Rome at Beneventum
(Benevento).
The next year he invaded Macedonia, drove out
Antigonus II Gonatas to Thessalonica, and took over the defecting Macedonian
army. Suddenly abandoning Macedonia, however, he launched an unsuccessful attack
on Sparta to restore Cleonymus (272). Violations of royal tombs by a garrison of
Gauls at Aegae offended people, and Pyrrhus went south to invade the Peloponnese,
leaving his son Ptolemy in charge. Antigonus Gonatas regained control of
Macedonia and conveyed an army by sea to Corinth against Pyrrhus, whose son
Ptolemy was killed in an ambush by the forces of King Areus of Sparta. At Argos
Pyrrhus was trapped between the armies of the Macedonians and the Spartans and
killed by a tile thrown from a rooftop in 272 BC, supposedly by an old woman
seeing him fighting her son sword to sword in the street below. Other sources
read that he was assassinated by a servant.

Pictures of the Epirote Army
Carthaginians
vs Pyrrhus of Epirus Battle Report
Heraclea
(Romans vs Pyrrhus of Epirus) Battle Report
Back to
history page
To the
Index
page
|